Picture Comment....

Well, we'll all agree to the fact, that this not a picture but rather a text....

Cartoon

Comment this picture!

Here are a few guidelines to structure your comment. They do not have to be used, they are just hints! Feel free to structure your comment the way you want!
- Describe what you see (who is standing and where, what is happening...)
- Describe what the picture means, and explain it. (Use examples such as man/woman relations when looking for a job, in politics...)
- Give your personal point of view!


Do not hesitate to search the internet for vocabulary, but please avoid automatic translators!
Try using www.wordreference.com, from French to English, but also for English-English definitions. You can learn a lot just through synonyms!

Here is another useful website: www.lexilogos.com

You will find loads of different ways to find and learn new words, whether through their definitions, synonyms, expressions or sounds! Just be curious!

( puits à souhaits = wishing well)

The Funny English Language

This riddle has been taken from the website:
http://users.tinyonline.co.uk/gswithenbank/funnyeng.htm

Check it out, for there is more to see there!

We'll begin with a box and the plural is boxes,
But the plural of ox should be oxen, not oxes.

The one fowl is a goose but two are called geese,
Yet the plural of moose should never be meese.

You may find a lone mouse or a whole set of mice,
Yet the plural of house is houses not hice.

If the plural of man is always called men,
Why shouldn't the plural of pan be called pen?

If I speak of a foot and you show me your feet,
And I give you a boot, would a pair be called beet?

If I speak of a foot and you show me your feet,
And I give you a boot, would a pair be called beet?

If one is a tooth and a whole set are teeth,
Why should not the plural of booth be called beeth?

Then one may be that and three would be those,
Yet hat in the plural wouldn't be hose,
And the plural of cat is cats and not cose.

We speak of a brother and also of brethren,
But though we say mother, we never say methren.

Then the masculine pronouns are he, his and him,
But imagine the feminine she, shis and shim.

Then the masculine pronouns are he, his and him,
But imagine the feminine she, shis and shim.

So English, I fancy you will all agree,
Is the funniest language you ever did see.

God sued over pestilence and terror

WASHINGTON (AFP) - A court in Nebraska is being asked to cast judgement on the ultimate judge -- God.

State lawmaker Ernie Chambers filed a lawsuit Friday against the Almighty -- acknowledging he/she goes by numerous aliases -- for causing "fearsome floods, egregious earthquakes, horrendous hurricanes, terrifying tornadoes, pestilential plagues" and other alliterative catastrophes.

The suit, Chambers vs God, asks the court for a "permanent injunction ordering defendant (God) to cease certain harmful activities and the making of terrorist threats" which affect innumerable persons, including Chambers's constituents.

It asserts that God is "the admitted perpetrator" of such acts and said that God's omnipresence gives the local Douglas County District Court jurisdiction in the suit, adding that God's omniscience eliminates the need to issue a formal notice of the lawsuit.

Chambers told local media he filed the suit to make a point about frivolous lawsuits frequently seen in US courts, citing a recent one against a judge.

He asked the court to award him an unspecified summary judgment against God, or, in the alternative, issue a permanent injunction against God engaging in the damaging acts cited in the filing.

Neither God nor his/her spokespersons could be contacted for comment.